Showing posts with label Nobel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nobel. Show all posts

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why Tolstoy Was Denied the Nobel Prize in Literature

Are Nobel Prize Judges the wisest of the wisest or mere mortals?

Every year, the Nobel Prizes are awarded. But one cannot understand the hype it generates. Is it because the laureates created a work of distinction that supposedly confer 'the greatest benefit to mankind'?

If so the members of the Nobel Prize Committee must be endowed with godly wisdom so as to decide what constitutes the 'greatest work'.

Are they? May be! But here are some of the famous cases dug up from history of Nobel Prizes that suggest otherwise.

If a curious mind penetrates behind the scene, he will learn that the Judges or Members of the Selection Committee of the Nobel Prizes are mere mortals filled with high-flying vanities, prejudices, petty rivalries, frailties all perfectly blended with intelligence, honesty, wisdom and courage.

Alfred Bernhard Nobel {1833-1896} virtually opened the floodgates of controversies and congratulations by unintentionally [or deliberately?] omitting in his will the yardsticks to measure what constitutes 'the greatest work'.

On 10th December 1901, the first crowning ceremony started off with a bang with five distinguished persons winning the Prize, but the bang did emanate some jarring notes that was to be heard for many long years to come.

Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy 1828-1910

Tolstoy authored War and Peace and Anna Karenina which were acknowledged as the greatest works of realist fiction.

Why Tolstoy was denied the Nobel Prize

When Sully Prudhomme {1839-1907}, a French poet was selected and awarded the Nobel Prize by Swedish Academy for his literary works that interpreted the conflict between emotions and reason, the world opinion protested. Not because Prudhomme got the Prize, but Tolstoy was ignored; and to this effect 42 scientists and artists signed a tribute to the slighted celebrity {Tolstoy} in protest against the Academy's indifference to Tolstoy.

Yet the Swedish Academy did not consider him even for 1902 Literary Prize. Thanks to Swede's only literary expert of the time, Carl David af Wirsen {1842-1912 the Academy's Permanent Secretary and Chairman, Nobel Committee for literature whose verdict put out all hopes of Tolstoy ever winning the Prize.

Card David af Wirsen, the Powerful Judge on the Nobel Committee

Carl David af Wirsen, opined, "'War and Peace' and 'Annakerenina' deserved the Prize... while his religious sociological and political writings were regarded as both immature and misleading... he has condemned all forms of civilization and urged instead a primitive mode of life divorced from all forms of higher culture... though completely inexperienced in Biblical criticism he has ambitiously rewritten the New Testament in a half-rationalistic, half-mystical spirit confronted by such expressions of narrow minded hostility to all forms of civilization, one feels dubious. One does not like to bestow recognition... it would be wrong to force on the great writer such a reward... "

Having read the Chairman Wirsen's report what one would say but sigh in vain!?

Maxim Gorky, the Revolutionary Writer

Even Maxim Gorky's{1868 - 1936} famous autobiography could have been 'placed in the front rank' for the Prize. But the Academy found it difficult to arrive at a wholly objective judgment as the intellectual part he had played during the revolution and his other works were 'politically colored'.

Judging literary merits on political colors! Truly, this is not one of the main stipulations in Nobel's will. That explains why the Russians did not get even one Prize for the first 50 years until World War II in all the faculties except for minor writer Ivan Bunin {1870-1953; 1933} and Ivan Petrovic Pavlov {1849-1936; 1904} for literature and physiology respectively.

Likewise, since the initiation of the Nobel Prizes in 1901, there were several instances where so many deserving celebrated personalities suffered victimization and were denied the Nobel Prize.

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to Chinese author Mo Yan whose citation read as, "who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary". Mo Yan is a pen name while the real name is Guan Moye. "Mo Yan" in Chinese language means "don't speak."

This article is published in my personal blog http://writersden-jay.blogspot.in/ under the category of Human Interest Features. There are several more articles of such nature in my blog, which you will find them interesting to read on.


View the original article here

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

The Victims Of Nobel Prizes: Maugham, Joyce And Greene

Learn why eminent classic writers like William Somerset Maugham, James Joyce, and Graham Greene did not receive the Nobel Prize in Literature. What happened behind the scenes? Why were they denied the Prize in Literature? Are they not worth it? Here are the interesting facts dug out from the history of Nobel Prizes. Read on... they make good reading.

Why was it the famous classic writers William Somerset Maugham, Graham Greene and James Joyce were denied the Prize when they truly deserved it? Is it because their works are inferior and did not possess literary merits? Is it because they did not produce the most distinguished works of idealistic tendency, which Alfred Nobel clearly stipulated as a criterion in his will?

If one peeps behind the scenes and read between the lines, he will learn that the judges or members of the Selection Committee of the Nobel Prizes are mere mortals filled with high-flying vanities, prejudices, petty rivalries, frailties all mixed up with intelligence, honesty, wisdom and courage.

Hedin, one of the powerful judges on the Nobel Committee with his shortsightedness delivered his judgment on William Somerset Maugham as 'Too popular and undistinguished'. When questioned about James Joyce (1882-1941), Hedin reportedly remarked, 'Who is he'?

And William Somerset Maugham (1874-1965) cannot be too popular and undistinguished at the same time. If he is popular he is distinguished, if he is unpopular he is undistinguished. William Somerset Maugham truly deserved the Nobel Prize for his 'Of Human Bondage'.

Such a soul-stirring semi-autobiographical classic 'Of Human Bondage' © 1915; the story revolves around a club-footed youth who genuinely falls in love with a beautiful girl. He then goes beyond his means to give anything in this world to win her. In return, he often finds himself being snubbed by her derisively and ruthlessly exploited suffering humiliation in the process. Yet he takes everything in his stride. And the way this club-footed youth reasons with his soul and justifies his actions and indulgences makes the novel a more moving classic. This is also in a way a semi-autobiography. Truly a masterpiece that is full of literary merit 'Of Human Bondage' that deserved the Prize.

In 1974 too, Graham Greene {1904-1991} of England, Vladimir Nabokov of Russia and Saul Bellow of United States were hot contenders for the Nobel Prize in Literature. But Eyvind Johnson and Harry Martinsonboth Sweden nationals and who are unknown outside their home country were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. But does anyone know that these two authors were Nobel Judges themselves. What an Irony!

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to Chinese author Mo Yan whose citation read as, "who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary". Mo Yan is a pen name while the real name is Guan Moye. "Mo Yan" in Chinese language means "don't speak".

This article is published in my personal blog http://writersden-jay.blogspot.in/ under the category of Human Interest Features. There are several more articles of such nature in my blog, which you will find them interesting to read on.


View the original article here