Tuesday, February 19, 2013

VIPRE Internet Security - I feel safe to do my everyday activities online!

This is a Sponsored post written by me on behalf of Vipre for SocialSpark. All opinions are 100% mine.

I have used VIPRE for many years, and I have yet to be let down. It's great anti-virus software, which blocks all those nasty bugs that attack our computer. Easy to install, and it does not overwhelm my computer. I was given a chance from SocialSpark to try VIPRE Internet Security software, and I am so grateful.

 

In the past I've always used the free AVG. It has always seemed to do the trick. What I didn't care for was the pop up window that always comes up when I get an email that says "scanning email" - mostly just a distraction. I'm not sure if that could be turned off or not? The menus always look like ads (because they are).  I like how VIPRE Internet Security software works behind the scenes when receiving emails. I ran a scan while working on another project and using the internet and it didn't slow down my computer at all.

 

My overall Review, VIPRE Internet Security software is like a condom for my computer, I have told people for years, an unprotected computer is like unprotected sex, you will catch a virus. I have no worries with VIPRE. I feel safe to do my everyday activities online and not be hacked by some nut in another country, or another town for that matter. VIPRE has been a staple on my computer for years, and I have no plans to change anything anytime soon. Although I do not shop online, just am yet to feel comfortable enough to give my numbers out to anyone in the internet world, with VIPRE, I would feel a lot more comfortable, not saying I would begin a shopping spree, but I would not do it without VIPRE Security on my computer.

Another thing that really impressed me is that they us customer support people here in the UNITED STATES. THANK YOU! It’s great to see a company use US employees rather than have someone thousands of miles away in a foreign country answering my questions. Too many companies are quick to want to save a buck or two and outsource to other countries where they can pay their employee pennies a day. I like using US based customer service reps too because it helps when there isn’t a language barrier.

 

VIPRE has online chat tech support too. I cannot tell you how great that is to have. I have an online chat support with my website host and I use it every time there is an issue. For me it’s easier to do a chat then it is to talk on the phone.

 

Tech support both online and over the phone is available from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM. I like that they have late hours too. That works out great for people who have to work. Often customer service is only available from 9:oo AM – 5:00 PM.

 

If you need more information about VIPRE products and technology, feel free to visit viprevirus.com. The reviews in the website are also helpful. Please take time to read what satisfied customers say about VIPRE.

 

Give Vipre antivirus software a try!

Visit Sponsor's Site

Sunday, February 17, 2013

The Place in History of, PYRRHUS OF EPIRUS - 319-272 BC

In this article, I will attempt to present a brief biography of Pyrrhus as a prelude to a discussion of the critical importance of his life and career, which had profound effects on both Ancient Rome and Greece.

Pyrrhus was a central and important figure in the Hellenistic World that followed Alexander the Great (356 - 323 B.C.). He was also the one to begin the struggle between the Greeks and the Romans for domination of the eastern Mediterranean, and he foresaw the titanic contest between the Romans and the Carthaginians in the west.

One indication of the importance of his career is that Hannibal described him as the greatest commander of an army the world had seen, after Alexander himself. An admiration similar to that of Napoleon toward Frederick the Great of Prussia.

The early part of his life was troubled, with dynastic coups displacing both his father, Aeacides, the king of Epirus, and himself. Pyrrhus was an infant when his father lost his throne. A group of loyal friends fled Epirus, taking Pyrrhus with them, and the party sought refuge at the court of Glaucias, the king of Illyria. It is said Glaucias was unsure of what to do, as he was afraid of Cassander, the king of Macedonia, who had been the enemy of Aeacides. His heart softened to Pyrrhus, however. Glaucias took him into his household, cared for him as a son, and restored him to his throne when he was twelve years of age, leaving a council of wise men to act as his advisors until he was old enough to rule in his own right.

Pyrrhus's own displacement occurred when he was 17 years of age. He had travelled from Epirus to Illyria to attend the marriage of one of Glaucias's sons. During his absence the throne was taken by a kinsman, Neoptolemus. This man carried the same name as the son of Achilles, who was the legendary founder of the line of the Epirote royal family.

It was after Pyrrhus's own coup when he began his journey on the world stage.

Following his exile, Pyrrhus joined the court of Antigonus and Demetrius, the father and son rulers of Anatolia, the eastern seabord of the Mediterranean, and part of Greece. This was a natural step for Pyrrhus to take, as Demetrius had married his sister, Deidameia.

Antigonus had been one of Alexander's senior generals, and after the Battle of the Granicus, in 334 B.C., he had been made the Governor of Phrygia.

The Granicus was the first of the four major battles fought by Alexander, and Antigonus was the first governor appointed to rule conquered territory in Alexander's name.

The territory under his sway was expanded over the years, and in the settlement made in Babylon by the Council of Generals following the death of Alexander.

Antigonus spent the rest of his life trying to keep the empire left by Alexander intact.

Pyrrhus joined Antigonus and Demetrius at a critical time, shortly before the fateful Battle of Ipsus in 301 B.C.

In the 22 years since Alexander's death in 323 B.C., his generals, the Successors or Diadachoi, had fought each other over Alexander's empire. This struggle was inevitable, and foreseen by Alexander in his dying moments, as there was no clear succession that would follow his death. The only blood relatives who could succeed him were his infant son by Roxanne, Alexander IV, who could not have universal support because she was a Bactian princess rather than a Macedonian, and his half-brother Philip Arridhaeus, who was a halfwit.

Many of the generals died in these struggles, but by 301 B.C., the empire of Alexander was divided up into four great Hellenistic kingdoms, in addition to Macedonia itself

MACEDONIA - Ruled by Cassander, the son of Antipater, Alexander's Regent.

ANATOLIA, the eastern seabord of the Mediterranean, and part of Greece, ruled by Antigonus and Demetrius.

ASIA was ruled by Seleucus. (Syria, Mesopotamia and the eastern territories of Alexander's empire).

EGYPT - Ruled by Ptolemy.

THRACE - Ruled by Lysimachus.

The Battle of Ipsus, where Pyrrhus commanded an infantry brigade, was fought by Antigonus and Demetrius against the invading forces of Lysimachus and Seleucus. It was a battle of heroic proportions, both sides bringing over 70,000 men. The critical element was the squadron of 400 war elephants brought by Seleucus.

The left wing of the army, part of which was under Pyrrhus's command, overcame their adversaries, but Demetrius pursued the enemy cavalry too far, leaving the army without cavalry support. The elephant squadron brought by Seleucus then trapped Antigonus's infantry. Antigonus was killed and the battle lost.

Pyrrhus and Demetrius fled Anatolia with part of the army, collected their fleet at Ephesus and retired to Greece. Contrary to their expectations, Athens refused to admit Demetrius, and they went on to Megara to consider their options. Demetrius soon undertook a campaign in Thrace, to ravage Lysimachus's territory while Lysimachus was still in Anatolia, arguing over the spoils with Seleucus.

Pyrrhus remained in Greece, to supervise Demetrius's territory. In Athens Pyrrhus gained the acquaintance of Cineas, a Thessalian who had studied oratory with Demosthenes. Cineas became Pyrrhus's friend and counsellor. Pyrrhus was later to say that Cineas had taken more towns with his oratory than he had taken with his army.

Demetrius's fortunes improved considerably, and he was offered a treaty of peace by Ptolemy. Pyrrhus travelled to Egypt as a political hostage, to guarantee the pact. In Egypt, Pyrrhus was treated as part of Ptolemy's family, just as Philip had been in Thebes by Epaminondas. He was educated in the role of a king, and married Ptolemy's step-daughter, Antigone. Ptolemy then restored Pyrrhus as king of Epirus, in 298 B.C.

The nature of Pyrrhus's kingship was precarious however, as to avoid a civil war, his return was negotiated as a dual kingship with Neoptolemus. The two kings fell out, and Pyrrhus preemptively assassinated Neoptolemus. Now settled as the sole king of Epirus, Pyrrhus became involved in the complicated politics of the Aegean. He joined the struggle of the other kings against Demetrius, and became a key figure in neighbouring Macedonia. For a short time he even became king of Macedonia. By 281 B.C. Pyrrhus's adventures in Greece had been played out for some time, and he had spent several years at peace in Epirus, improving the well-being of his country. This despite the fact that he lost his dear wife, Antigone. It was then that he was invited to help the city of Tarentum and curb the ambitions of the Romans in southern Italy. Like Achilles, he was restless at times of inactivity, and as Plutarch quotes from the Iliad, "... but heart-sick he brooded, pining at home for the war-cry, the noise of the battle."

His invasion of Italy and then of Sicily were the defining moments of his life, both in terms of the greatness of the undertaking, and the costly second victory over the Romans at Asculum which gave rise to the expression, "A Pyrrhic victory." A victory that comes at such a cost that it threatens to destroy the victor.

After both his victories, at Heracleia and Asculum, Pyrrhus sent Cineas to negotiate a treaty of peace with Rome, as it was clear to him that it was beyond his resources to conquer the Romans.

The response to Pyrrhus's overtures was a critical moment in Roman history.

Pyrrhus offered an alliance with Rome, in which he would help the Romans to complete the conquest of Italy. In return, all he asked for was for Rome to consider him a friend, and acknowledge the independence of the Greek cities in southern Italy. His proposals were favourably considered by most of the Senate, but the Roman response was guided by a speech by the aged and blind Appius Claudius. He asked what was Rome doing in agreeing to accept help from a man whose army could not hold a fraction of Macedonia, and declaring to the world their inability to fight their own battles.

From this moment, the Romans refused to discuss any proposal of peace until Pyrrhus evacuated Italy.

Pyrrhus then left a garrison at Tarentum, and invaded Sicily, having been invited by the cities of Syracuse and Agrigentum to help them repel the Carthaginians. Pyrrhus's campaigns were initially successful, but he fell out with the Greek cities and returned to Italy, where he was finally defeated by the Romans at the battle of Beneventum. He then withdrew from Italy, and returned to Greece with the remnants of his army.

We can see from his campaigns in Italy and Sicily, that Pyrrhus has a unique place in history.

1) He was the one to begin the struggle for supremacy between the Greeks and the Romans. He was a critical figure in the time of transition between the world of Alexander and the world of Rome.

2) The refusal of the Romans to accept any foreign help or interference in Italy indicates a moment of self-awareness where perhaps they began to see the great path ahead of them.

3) The idea that Roman security depended on complete control of central and southern Italy spurred them on, so that this was achieved by the time the First Punic War began in 264 B.C. This conflict was essentially a fight to the death between Rome and Carthage, and at its end in 241 B.C., Rome had complete control of Sicily.

Another intriguing philosophical point is made apparent by Pyrrhus's view of his campaigns. In Plutarch's Life of Flaminius, the point is made that apart from the victories against the Persians, "... Greece fought all her battles against and to enslave herself. Every one of her trophies stands as a memorial to her own shame and misfortune."

When pressed for a statement of purpose by Cineas before undertaking the invasion of Italy, Pyrrhus was led to declare that the only thing that really mattered was a position of leadership in Greece, and all other campaigns were a means to that end. This may serve to soften Plutarch's severe criticism of the endless internecine conflicts between the Greek states over the centuries.

Here one can see how the greatness of the vision of Alexander and his father Philip was unique in the Greek world.

Following his return to Greece, Pyrrhus again became involved in dynastic conflicts, this time in the Peloponnese, and was killed in a battle in the streets of Argos. As foretold, Pyrrhus left behind him the name of a great warrior, but one who ultimately failed because his visions were greater than his resources.


View the original article here

Friday, February 15, 2013

How I Write My Stories

Every story begins with an idea, one has to write about something, right? Ideas can come from anywhere. Something you hear on the radio or in a song, something you see happening around you or on the television. Something in the shape of a tree you see when you take a walk through the forest, ideas can come from everywhere.

Having an idea you have to put it on paper. Some authors immediately have the whole story inside their heads and they create an outline.

Meaning that they write down what should be happening at the beginning of the story, what in the middle, and how it should end. Often the characters are worked out in that outline as well. Some go even further and make a timeline, setting out what should happen when.

Authors writing mystery novels often use that so there are no mistakes in the chronology of the story and it all fits together at the dramatic conclusion.

When writing was still done by hand and on paper some writers had blank page fear so they wrote on rolls of wallpaper so there would not be a new empty page to fill.

For many writers the above is the perfect way of working, and in many cases it is, it is a sort of lifeline to hold on to.

For me it doesn't work, if I use that way I feel like I'm tied to follow the line set out.

When I start a story I haven't got the foggiest where the story will take me, what characters will show up or what is going to happen.

A very faint idea runs around in my foggy brain for a while and then I see or hear something that makes some cock wheels fall into place, I let them run for a while and then I sit behind my desk to paint a picture with words. I see the picture in my minds eye and it starts to move like film, I simply write down what I see happening.

Some who read my stories always say that is written like a film.

Consciously I don't know yet where the story will take me, without doubt the whole story is in my subconscious mind already steering me where I need to go.

When I have written about fifty or a hundred pages it slowly begins to dawn on me where I want to go to, but not what is going to happen on the way there.

So I make all kinds of sidesteps that, in some inexplicable way, always have effect on the whole story. Sometimes it explains something, other times it is to find something that is needed later in the story, but it always adds pages.

The fun of writing this way is that people who read it get dragged into the story, find it hard to put the book down once they start reading.

Another thing that is fun about writing fantasy stories is that you can make all things happen and you can create all kinds of creatures. Like in the scene the main characters are on their way to SoboiĆ­ and a Caragh appears. To tell the truth I still don't know where that awful creature came from, probably from some deep place in my mind.

In fantasy stories the only limit is your own imagination.

What is most important is that writing should be fun and in the way I write and deal with it the characters are not just names on a piece of paper they are living and breathing beings to me. I feel their pain, their joy, their fear, and their hope, that is also why, when I finish a story, I am sad for a few days, because I have said goodbye to people that have been part of my life for a longer period of time, people I will never see again.


View the original article here

5 Tips for Organizing a Charity Golf Day

Charity golf days are a brilliant way to raise funds for a good cause whilst also having a lot of fun. 'Golf is the best way to ruin a good walk' and I kinda agree with that ideology seeing as I take one good shot in ten. But for many enthusiasts out there, what could be a better way to help a charity than to do it be playing a game you love. Perfect!

Here's a few tips on how to organise a successful charity golf day -

1. Secure a Golf Cub
Make sure you get your regular golf cub involved to ensure you have a good venue to play the tournament, and of course, advertise it. Being linked in with a good course is a great way to drum up interest from the local players and the community in general.

2. Fail to Prepare, Prepare to Fail
Get your advertising up an d running at least 2 months in advance so that everyone has a chance to get the date in their diaries. Inform the local press and radio stations, and of course the charity themselves. They usually have a far reaching network of people to advertise such events to, the more the merrier we say.

3. Entertainment
It's a fun day out, so why not add a few special touches so that it really is a memorable day for all those taking part. You could organise a band to play after everyone has finished, or may a quick cocktail on the 9th hole to refresh the parts other drinks can't quite hit!

4. Sponsorship
Speak to local businesses and see if they would like to get involved in helping to pay some of the outgoings of the event. You'd be surprised how many people get involved in such charitable sporting events, plus it's tax deductible, so no major financial issue for those businesses that join the team.

5. Trophies
Always looks good in the paper when you see someone's broad smile after picking up a trophy, so make sure you get a few in, including a few fun ones like 'most putts' and 'king of the water' for those that people who may not win the first prize, but get a chance for a bit of memorabilia from a fantastic day.

Here's hoping that if you do plan a charity golf day that it runs smoothly and you have every success in your endeavour. What a fantastic way to help raise money for a charity by letting people take part in a sport they love, oh the hardship!!

Donation4Charity and Charity Gifts are two charity sites in the UK providing people with the ability to select across a range of charitable gifts that can be given on special events to friends or family.


View the original article here

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why Tolstoy Was Denied the Nobel Prize in Literature

Are Nobel Prize Judges the wisest of the wisest or mere mortals?

Every year, the Nobel Prizes are awarded. But one cannot understand the hype it generates. Is it because the laureates created a work of distinction that supposedly confer 'the greatest benefit to mankind'?

If so the members of the Nobel Prize Committee must be endowed with godly wisdom so as to decide what constitutes the 'greatest work'.

Are they? May be! But here are some of the famous cases dug up from history of Nobel Prizes that suggest otherwise.

If a curious mind penetrates behind the scene, he will learn that the Judges or Members of the Selection Committee of the Nobel Prizes are mere mortals filled with high-flying vanities, prejudices, petty rivalries, frailties all perfectly blended with intelligence, honesty, wisdom and courage.

Alfred Bernhard Nobel {1833-1896} virtually opened the floodgates of controversies and congratulations by unintentionally [or deliberately?] omitting in his will the yardsticks to measure what constitutes 'the greatest work'.

On 10th December 1901, the first crowning ceremony started off with a bang with five distinguished persons winning the Prize, but the bang did emanate some jarring notes that was to be heard for many long years to come.

Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy 1828-1910

Tolstoy authored War and Peace and Anna Karenina which were acknowledged as the greatest works of realist fiction.

Why Tolstoy was denied the Nobel Prize

When Sully Prudhomme {1839-1907}, a French poet was selected and awarded the Nobel Prize by Swedish Academy for his literary works that interpreted the conflict between emotions and reason, the world opinion protested. Not because Prudhomme got the Prize, but Tolstoy was ignored; and to this effect 42 scientists and artists signed a tribute to the slighted celebrity {Tolstoy} in protest against the Academy's indifference to Tolstoy.

Yet the Swedish Academy did not consider him even for 1902 Literary Prize. Thanks to Swede's only literary expert of the time, Carl David af Wirsen {1842-1912 the Academy's Permanent Secretary and Chairman, Nobel Committee for literature whose verdict put out all hopes of Tolstoy ever winning the Prize.

Card David af Wirsen, the Powerful Judge on the Nobel Committee

Carl David af Wirsen, opined, "'War and Peace' and 'Annakerenina' deserved the Prize... while his religious sociological and political writings were regarded as both immature and misleading... he has condemned all forms of civilization and urged instead a primitive mode of life divorced from all forms of higher culture... though completely inexperienced in Biblical criticism he has ambitiously rewritten the New Testament in a half-rationalistic, half-mystical spirit confronted by such expressions of narrow minded hostility to all forms of civilization, one feels dubious. One does not like to bestow recognition... it would be wrong to force on the great writer such a reward... "

Having read the Chairman Wirsen's report what one would say but sigh in vain!?

Maxim Gorky, the Revolutionary Writer

Even Maxim Gorky's{1868 - 1936} famous autobiography could have been 'placed in the front rank' for the Prize. But the Academy found it difficult to arrive at a wholly objective judgment as the intellectual part he had played during the revolution and his other works were 'politically colored'.

Judging literary merits on political colors! Truly, this is not one of the main stipulations in Nobel's will. That explains why the Russians did not get even one Prize for the first 50 years until World War II in all the faculties except for minor writer Ivan Bunin {1870-1953; 1933} and Ivan Petrovic Pavlov {1849-1936; 1904} for literature and physiology respectively.

Likewise, since the initiation of the Nobel Prizes in 1901, there were several instances where so many deserving celebrated personalities suffered victimization and were denied the Nobel Prize.

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to Chinese author Mo Yan whose citation read as, "who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary". Mo Yan is a pen name while the real name is Guan Moye. "Mo Yan" in Chinese language means "don't speak."

This article is published in my personal blog http://writersden-jay.blogspot.in/ under the category of Human Interest Features. There are several more articles of such nature in my blog, which you will find them interesting to read on.


View the original article here

The Early History of Steel

Steel is an alloy that is made by combining iron with a number of other elements, usually carbon. It is one of the most common metals in the world and can be found in a huge number of everyday objects. Steel is used in the manufacture of automobiles, buildings and ships and is often used to make tools. Steel is strong and durable but can also withstand a certain amount of tension. It is also better than other metals at holding a sharp edge. Today 1.3 billion tons of steel is produced annually and is usually made using a blast furnace. Many people think that steel is something of a fairly modern invention - a process that was only invented and refined in the past few centuries. This viewpoint, however, is only half right. The process of steelmaking was improved upon in the last few centuries to make it easily mass producible. However, the invention of steel goes much farther back in history than you might expect.

Humans have been working with iron for thousands of years; this is hardly surprising as it is one of the most abundant elements on Earth. Production of iron probably started around 2000 BC; where previously bronze had been the main hard material used to produce tools and implements (i.e. the Bronze Age). Gradually the production of iron began to overtake the use of bronze. This was mainly because iron was harder, and therefore more useful, than bronze and could hold a sharper edge better. These properties made iron a much better choice to make tools and implements out of and its popularity grew through what we now know as the Iron Age.

Different types of iron have different amounts of carbon in which gives them different properties. Wrought iron has only a little carbon in it (only around 0.02 per cent) which makes it more malleable but not as strong. Cast iron has much more carbon in (around 3-4.5 per cent) and as a result is much stronger but far less malleable - it is almost brittle. Steel comes somewhere in between the two. Steel usually only has between 0.2 and 1.5 per cent carbon in it and is harder than wrought iron but more flexible than cast iron.

Steel production was made more efficient around the 17th century and production was made more inexpensive in the 19th century due to various developments in the process. Though steel did not really take off until the Early Modern period when it could be mass produced, it was being made hundreds of years before this time by people with much less sophisticated technology. One of the earliest examples of steel was found in Anatolia and was dated as being 4,000 years old. Other very early examples include steel dating to 1400 BC found in East Africa most likely made by the Haya people in an early kind of blast furnace.

The most famous of kinds of early steel are wootz and Damascus steel - their fame is possibly down to the air of mystery that surrounds them. Wootz steel was made as early as 300 BC in India and Sri Lanka using a wind furnace that utilised the power of the monsoon winds. Damascus steel was a similar form of steel that many historians believe was made from ingots of wootz steel that had been brought to the Middle East by Indian traders. Damascus steel was widely regarded for its advanced properties and legends grew up around it that it was so sharp and strong that could slice through a rifle barrel. The processes used to make wootz steel and Damascus steel were used for centuries until the methods were lost prior to the 18th century. Many historians have attempted to research the process and many experimental archaeologists have tried to recreate the steel to mostly no avail. The original techniques for these types of steel have been lost for centuries.

It may be surprising to think that steel was produced so early on in history. Though wootz steel and Damascus steel may be the most well-known among metallurgists and historians, there were many other countries making steel at a similar time. The Romans used Noric steel in their weaponry which was well-known for its strength. The Iberian Peninsula also produced steel weapons around the 4th century BC while the Chinese used quench hardened steel throughout the 4th and 3rd centuries BC. By the 1st century AD the Chinese had also created carbon-intermediate steel by melting wrought iron with cast iron. Steel production was made more efficient in the 17th century through the smelting of iron ore into pig iron in a blast furnace. It was also made easier to mass-produce in the 19th century through the introduction of the Bessemer process. These changes and improvements did go some way to revolutionising steel production but the history of steel goes much further back in history than many may think.

© Izzy Evans 2012

If you would like to find out more about the manufacturing of steel then you can visit Steel Suppliers.


View the original article here

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Expressing Spiritual Reality

In any number of teachings, spiritual reality is regarded as being indescribable and unexplainable. I think that these teachings are wrong. Spiritual reality is in fact explainable - if you are good enough at explaining.

The best way to be able to describe spiritual reality comes from better right brain - left brain integration. There are many ways to achieve that; but my favorite one is extended metaphor. Metaphor allows one to draw comparisons between parts of the universe that aren't normally compared. And this makes it possible to see common themes - common themes that are part of the underlying reality that is common to all.

In 1995, I went on the Internet as DR. ROCKET and used extended metaphor based on that theme left and right. Soon everything was about nuclear weapons and half-lives and silos and black holes and supernovas. What started basically as a joke went to a large-scale extended metaphor that sometimes produced meaningful observations. Pretty soon I was writing things that people described as transcendent - by virtue of using extended metaphor to see deeper into underlying reality and demonstrate the underlying themes.

A lot of art, from surrealism onwards, has been about expressing not things in physical world but states of mind. The large part of the reason is that, with photography and video, it is possible to capture real-world objects precisely; which means that there is less demand for paintings that describe the physical world. Thus a lot of the art has been about reproducing not physical objects but mindsets. That is because mindsets cannot be photographed, and it takes artistic expression to transmit them.

Does that mean that there is no merit for realist art? Absolutely not - in fact there is now a style of sculpture called super-realism that produces sculptures that look like they are alive. Some of the most beautiful artwork I've seen came from a lady artist named Julia Howard, who photographed things in the real world and used them to express feelings and mindsets. She could look at a flower, a path, even peeled paint on the door, and turn it into a work of art. She married the realistic with the emotional to photograph emotional themes in the physical world. This was one way of explaining, or at least expressing, the spiritual - by finding its representations reflected in the physical world. She found a way to visually express emotional reality, motivating me to do the same thing through poetry that I wrote about her.

Some of the most profound expression of spiritual themes is found in the literature of Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Dostoyevsky was an epileptic, which means that he constantly had right brain and left brain in contact with one another. I've also known a poet in America - named 13 of Nazareth - who also is epileptic; and his descriptions of spiritual meanings are brilliant and profound. In both cases, there is strong left brain-right brain integration. And that makes spiritual reality that one feels verbally expressible.

All in all the spiritual themes are expressible; they just aren't typically easily expressible. They require an effort to be expressed. And whether this is done through photographs, through painting or through poetry and philosophy, it is a doable and worthwhile project.


View the original article here

Mary Parker Follet - Dynamic Administration

Mary Parker Follet occupies a prominent place in the comity of thinkers on administrative thought though she is less known in comparison to other thinkers. She initiated studies on industrial groups. Traditionally the social and political scientists concentrated on the studies of the state or the society but her studies were concentrated on the industry. She evolved principles of human association and organization in the context of industry. Her prominent works include The Speaker of the House of Representatives (1909), The New State (1920), Creative Experience (1924) and Dynamic Administration (1941). Dynamic Administration was posthumously edited by Metcalf and Urwick. Her views will be discussed under the following heads:

Idea of Constructive Conflict & the Ways of Resolving It

Follet gives quite important place to conflicts in her writings. According to her, conflicts are result of "socially valuable differences" and these are normal processes which may occur in any activity of the organization. Conflict should not be seen with any biases. It is neither good nor bad. It is just the appearance of difference which should be capitalized upon. As all polishing is done by friction, similarly conflicts could also be constructive and could enrich all. Follet gives three ways of dealing with conflict. These are described below:

A. Domination - It means victory of one side over the other. This seems to be the easiest way of resolving conflicts but it is not successful in the long run. The "repressed wishes" of the dominated always rebel against the dominator whenever it is possible.

B. Compromise - People settle most of their conflicts through compromise only. Each party to the conflict gives up a little in this method to resolve it. This quite wide accepted way of resolving conflict still people are reluctant to go for it as it involves losing something.

C. Integration - In this method two desires are integrated and there is no need to sacrifice its desires on any side. Follet favors this method of resolving conflict in comparison to other two methods. Domination is not preferable due to obvious reasons, compromise does not create something new but integration gives rise to the new ideas and innovation in social relationships. Integration also solves the problem permanently as it strikes at the root of the problem. In sum, integration is "win all" situation.

Steps in the Process of Integration

Follet gives there are following steps in the process of integration. These are as follows:

1. The first step is to bring the differences into open instead of suppressing them. The immediate necessity in resolving conflict is to understand and identify the nature of conflict.

2. Second step is to divide the whole conflict into smaller constituent parts. Sometimes the opposite process may be followed.

3. Third step is the anticipation of the conflict. It means knowing which way the conflict would head once the proposals are prepared and presented to the parties. It is like a game of chess where all moves are pre-calculated. "Circular" not linear response is required in anticipation of conflict.

Though Follet proposes integration as the way to resolve conflicts permanently still is alive to the problems in the whole process. Lack of inventiveness, habit of enjoying domination and use of proper language etc. are some of the problems. She emphasises on the proper training to resolve all these issues. According to her, courses on the art of co-operative thinking should be there both for the managers as well for the workers to master the art of integration.

The Law of Situation: Depersonalising Orders

Follet was concerned about too much of "Bossism" in giving orders. To avoid it she was suggested depersonalising orders. For this law of situation was proposed by Follet. According to this law, the order should not be given by one person to the other, rather both the order giver and the order taker should take the order from the situation. This law gives importance to the authority of the situation rather than the authority of the individual. Further Follet insists that the orders should be integral to the situation i. e. they should keep pace with the situation and should not be static. This will be possible only when the orders are taken from the situation and not externally.

Concept of "Power-with" rather than "Power over"

Follet terms power as the "ability to make things happen, to be a causal agent, to initiate change". She distinguishes "power-over" from "power-with". The former represents coercive power while the latter represents the co-active power. Power-with is better as people wish to be seen as working with someone rather than under someone. Also it promotes better understanding, reduces friction and encourages co-operation. According to Follet it is not possible for people to get rid of power over concept. But this can be accomplished by following the law of situations, functional unity and integration. Functional unity means that within his own sphere of functions, everyone has authority and responsibility for accomplishing those functions.

Functional Unity: Authority of Function

As already mentioned, functional unity means that for each allotted function each has authority and responsibility which go with that function. Further as authority rests with the function and not with the individual, authority/power cannot be delegated. Power is the result of knowledge and ability so it cannot be delegated. According to Follet, derivation of authority from some central authority should be replaced by the "authority of function" in which each individual has final authority within the allotted functions. Authority can be conferred on others but this is not delegation. According to her, delegation of authority should be an "obsolete expression". Like authority responsibility also flows from the situation. In the overall scheme of the things according to functional unity, the question that should be asked is "for what is he responsible rather than to whom is he responsible".

Concept of Leadership according to Follet

According to Follet the concept of leadership has also undergone significant changes due to the changing circumstances and new concepts such as human relations etc. Leadership does not come from the official status or position but from the attributes like encouraging initiative and energizing group. According to her such people are not just found at positions of power but throughout the organisation. She categorises three types of leaderships - leadership of position, leadership of personality and leadership of function. In modern organisations, those possess expert knowledge & skills and not the ones who have formal authority and personality actually lead. This is due to the fact that they take leadership due to the situation. It is the reason they can give orders even to

those in higher ranks. Follet lists three important functions of a leader. These are - coordination, definition of purpose and anticipation.

Critical Evaluation of Mary Parker Follet

Mary Parker Follet is called as one of the earliest behavioralists as she was among the earlier scholars to analyze the organizational behavior. Still some writers on organization theory have classified her as 'classical' thinker. She was criticized for not seeing the organizational processes in the social context. Some scholars regard her inconsistent in her approach as her ideas were not well organized. She analyzed the process of conflict resolution in detail and gave a new concept of integration. She negated the "Trait Theory" of leadership and advanced the situational variable to leadership. She conceived leadership to be function of three variables - the leader, followers and the situation. Situational control was the best form of control according to her.

Follet also gave the concept of "Cumulative Responsibility" which should be imbibed in the workers. According to this concept, realization of just the individual responsibility is not enough rather the workers should be made to realize "joint responsibility" which sensitizes them towards other units also. This automatically solves the problem of co- ordination also.

Due to her multi-dimensional focus, Urwick has described Follet as a "woman who had a universal mind." Though her ideas on integration were termed as illusory as they were good to look at but difficult to achieve still her contributions were phenomenal and she was in fact ahead of her times.

Mary Parker Follet gave many more theories on public administration. Read More about it on http://gkbasic.com/


View the original article here

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Regulatory Challenges in Humanitarian Organizations

After the Hurricane and Super Storm Sandy many of the federal relief efforts, like FEMA, were brought in and allowed to cut through bureaucracy and red tape to deliver the goods. In the trucking industry, the Department of Transportation, gave waivers on all trucks due to the 'hours of service rules'. This meant that truck drivers could drive more than eight hours at one time. The rescue relief efforts had to do this or they could get supplies and, things like fuel for the gas stations. Often the trucks had to be rerouted, which took up huge amounts of time even though they may only be traveling a few hundred miles.

What many people don't understand is that this problem happens in business all the time. All the rules and regulations slow down the supply chain and the flow of goods. It's interesting that the government doesn't understand that regulations hurt free-market enterprise and getting things done, but when the government wants to get things done in a hurry they realize they must forgo all the regulations. That is interesting isn't it?

Now then, there are always regulatory challenges in humanitarian efforts, and these are things that humanitarian organizations go through all the time regardless of which country they are assisting. It hardly matters if the humanitarian organization is large or small, they need bureaucrats and politicians running block for them so they can get their work done. Otherwise they get caught up in all the rules and regulations, and are dead in the water unable to help those people they are assigned to give assistance and relief efforts to. Consider if you will all the issues in our own society and civilization;

Laws
Red Tape
Bureaucracy
Rules and Regs

Humanitarian organizations after natural disasters especially have to move very quickly. If they are bogged down filling out forms, or unable to do certain things because there is some rule impeding their progress, then nothing gets done, and no one gets helped. Hurricane Super Storm Sandy (2012) was a perfect example in the aftermath in Lower Manhattan, Atlantic City, and other places in New Jersey. The authorities had to take charge, and completely dismiss large numbers of rules and regulations just to do what they needed to do.

If they were unable to bypass those laws and all that red tape, and bust through the blob of bureaucracy, they wouldn't have been able to help anyone, much less themselves. If they would have waited until everything was right, all the forms were filled out, and everything was done by the book, more people would have been without power, water, food, and perhaps even frozen to death or drown in the aftermath. Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative series of eBooks on Humanitarian Help. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net/


View the original article here

The Victims Of Nobel Prizes: Maugham, Joyce And Greene

Learn why eminent classic writers like William Somerset Maugham, James Joyce, and Graham Greene did not receive the Nobel Prize in Literature. What happened behind the scenes? Why were they denied the Prize in Literature? Are they not worth it? Here are the interesting facts dug out from the history of Nobel Prizes. Read on... they make good reading.

Why was it the famous classic writers William Somerset Maugham, Graham Greene and James Joyce were denied the Prize when they truly deserved it? Is it because their works are inferior and did not possess literary merits? Is it because they did not produce the most distinguished works of idealistic tendency, which Alfred Nobel clearly stipulated as a criterion in his will?

If one peeps behind the scenes and read between the lines, he will learn that the judges or members of the Selection Committee of the Nobel Prizes are mere mortals filled with high-flying vanities, prejudices, petty rivalries, frailties all mixed up with intelligence, honesty, wisdom and courage.

Hedin, one of the powerful judges on the Nobel Committee with his shortsightedness delivered his judgment on William Somerset Maugham as 'Too popular and undistinguished'. When questioned about James Joyce (1882-1941), Hedin reportedly remarked, 'Who is he'?

And William Somerset Maugham (1874-1965) cannot be too popular and undistinguished at the same time. If he is popular he is distinguished, if he is unpopular he is undistinguished. William Somerset Maugham truly deserved the Nobel Prize for his 'Of Human Bondage'.

Such a soul-stirring semi-autobiographical classic 'Of Human Bondage' © 1915; the story revolves around a club-footed youth who genuinely falls in love with a beautiful girl. He then goes beyond his means to give anything in this world to win her. In return, he often finds himself being snubbed by her derisively and ruthlessly exploited suffering humiliation in the process. Yet he takes everything in his stride. And the way this club-footed youth reasons with his soul and justifies his actions and indulgences makes the novel a more moving classic. This is also in a way a semi-autobiography. Truly a masterpiece that is full of literary merit 'Of Human Bondage' that deserved the Prize.

In 1974 too, Graham Greene {1904-1991} of England, Vladimir Nabokov of Russia and Saul Bellow of United States were hot contenders for the Nobel Prize in Literature. But Eyvind Johnson and Harry Martinsonboth Sweden nationals and who are unknown outside their home country were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. But does anyone know that these two authors were Nobel Judges themselves. What an Irony!

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to Chinese author Mo Yan whose citation read as, "who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary". Mo Yan is a pen name while the real name is Guan Moye. "Mo Yan" in Chinese language means "don't speak".

This article is published in my personal blog http://writersden-jay.blogspot.in/ under the category of Human Interest Features. There are several more articles of such nature in my blog, which you will find them interesting to read on.


View the original article here

Monday, February 11, 2013

The Decline Of Old Science

Science was doing remarkable progress during the days of the Hellenistic period from around 300 BC to 300 AD. Just consider the following examples:

In astronomy, Claudius Ptolemy had built a very accurate model of the universe, which in spite of a couple of evident flaws, was adopted for every purpose; from astrology to navigation, during the next fifteen hundred years.In Geography, Eratosthenes had measured the circumference of the Earth with astonishing precision.In Mathematics, Euclid had put together all ancient geometrical knowledge in his compilation book Elements, which served as a reference text until the arrival of Renaissance.In Engineering and applied Mathematics, Archimedes had built incredibly accurate mechanical devices for military defense and come really close to differential calculus with his method of exhaustion.

But that trend of advance was interrupted at the end of the Classical Era, and didn't fully gained momentum again until the rediscovery of Aristotelian natural philosophy and in fact until the arrival of Renaissance.

An immediate, important and legitimate question arises: Why did scientific progress in antiquity come to a halt?

Very frequently we hear that the main reason for this decay was the establishment of Christianity as official religion of the Roman Empire. The case supposedly rests on the documented negative reaction against existing pagan science. Some even say science was persecuted by law.

Such a question deserves a legitimate answer and the truth is very different from that simplistic approach.

There were two groups of causes that lead to this situation:

Cultural and religious change: There was indeed a turn for the worse in that sense and everything that had originated in paganism was rejected because it usually contradicted Scripture (the Bible). Academies were closed and even though there were never written laws against science; the atmosphere was unbearable for scientists. For instance, many of them were denounced as wizards for their simple use of astronomical instrumentsDeterioration of daily material conditions because of constant warfare. The continuous threat of barbaric invasions from outside and of heresies from inside created a climate of interminable riots, fights, military actions, persecutions which made life very precarious. People had no other choice but concentrating on daily survival. No resources were left for education and science.

As a result of these causes, science entered a period of stagnation which in Western Europe lasted until the arrival of the XIII century, when medieval harsh material conditions were alleviated a little by some advances in agriculture (new plough devices, better water mills) and scholars were able to spare some time to study the new copies of ancient Greek texts that were coming from Toledo (Spain) and Constantinople.

There were, by the way, some written laws against the art of Mathematica on the Theodosian and Justinian law compilations, from 400 and 500 BC respectively. Only Mathematica in old Latin, didn't mean mathematics but astrology or divination.

http://areasubliminal.com/category/english/

Science, Superstition and Communication

On my website you'll find a lot of interesting related material: extended texts, catchy videos, imaginative podcasts, instructive mind maps, beautiful images, keen comments from visitors; in English and in Spanish. I bet you won't regret a visit.


View the original article here

The Oracle of Dionysos in Ancient Thrace, Part 1: Literary Sources

In the works of some ancient writers is found information about an oracle of Dionysos in Thrace, the land of the Thracians - one of the wildest people in ancient Europe and "the most numerous people of the World, after the Indians" (according to Herodotus). The ancient sources about the oracle in question are as follows:

1. A Scholia to Euripides maintains that according to information of the "physicist Heraclides": "That [oracle?] of Dionysus was built in Thrace on the so-called Haemus, where is said, that there were some writings of Orpheus upon tablets". This could be the earliest evidence of oracle of Dionysos in Thrace. There is a clear location - in Mount Haemus.

2. Another scholia to Euripides, again with unknown and - in any event - later author, summarizes: "Some say, that the Oracle of Dionysus was in Pangaeus, other - in Haemus, where were some writings of Orpheus upon tablets, about which he speaks in Alcestis: "Not any drug in the Thracian tablets, where are written the sayings of Orpheus". And because Dionysus was and prophet, in "Bacchae" he says: "This god's a prophet, too, for in his rites the Bacchic celebrations and the madness a huge prophetic power is unleashed". The anonymous author presents an interesting localization of the oracle - in Pangaeus or in Haemus. As in the previous scholia, the oracle's localization is associated with some writings on tablets, whose authorship is attributed to Orpheus.

3. Traditionally, and not without reason, when it comes to the Oracle of Dionysus in Thrace in modern historiography, most attention is paid to the statement of Herodotus (ca. 484 - 424 BC), who wrote: "The Satrians however never yet became obedient to any man, so far as we know, but they remain up to my time still free, alone of all the Thracians; for they dwell in lofty mountains, which are covered with forest of all kinds and with snow, and also they are very skilful in war. These are they who possess the Oracle of Dionysos; which Oracle is on their most lofty mountains. Of the Satrians those who act as prophets of the temple are the Bessians; it is a priestess who utters the oracles, as at Delphi; and beyond this there is nothing further of a remarkable character." It has long been state the very general nature of Herodotus' information.

4. In an attributed to Aristotle text we read: "They say, that the rabbits, caught in Crestonia near the land of the Bisaltians, had two liver [two hearts] and had one spot sizes as one decare, in which each animal entered, dies. There is also a large and beautiful temple of Dionysus, in which was held a celebration and a sacrifice. When the god intends to make fruitful year, there appeared a great flame of fire, and it all, which are in the sacred area, see it.When the year will be barren, that light does not appeared and darkness covers the site, just as in the other nights."

5. Another text, also attributed to Aristotle, is preserved in the Saturnalia of Macrobius, drawn at the end of the 4th or beginning of the 5th century AD: "What was said about the Apollo can be said and for Liber. Aristotle, who wrote "Study of the Gods", claims that Apollo and Liber Pater are one and the same god, and many other evidence suggests that: even, he says, by the Ligyrians in Thrace was a temple, dedicated to Liber Pater, where predictions are issued, but they pronouncing their prophecies after drinking pure wine; as those on Claros drink water."

6. Elsewhere in his text, Macrobius wrote: "Similarly, we learn that in Thrace the Sun and Liber are considered the same: they call him Sabazius and worship him in a splendid ritual, as Alexander [Polyhistor] writes, and on the hill Zilmissos they dedicate to him a round temple, with open to the sky center. The temple's round shape points to the sun's shape, and light is let in through the roof to show that the sun purifies all things when it shines down from on high, and because the whole world opens up when the sun rises."

7. The later direct evidence about prediction, received in a Thracian oracle of Dionysus, is preserved by Suetonius: "Later, when Octavius was leading an army through remote parts of Thrace, and in the grove of Liber Pater consulted the priests about his son with barbarian rites, they made the same prediction [that the ruler of the world had been born]; since such a pillar of flame sprang forth from the wine that was poured over the altar, that it rose above the temple roof and mounted to the very sky, and such an omen had befallen no one save Alexander the Great, when he offered sacrifice at the same altar."

8. Cassius Dio mentions the following: "He [M. Licinius Crassus] over ran the rest of the country [Thrace] except the territory of the Odrysae. These he spared because they are attached to the service of Dionysus, and had come to meet him on this occasion without their arms; and he also granted them the land in which they magnify the god, taking it away from the Bessi who were occupying it."

So, this is what we can read in the ancient literature about the enigmatic oracle of Dionysos in Thrace. But is there was only one oracle? The answer is sought in the second part of this article.


View the original article here

Was Sherlock Holmes a Myth or Real?

Who is Sherlock Holmes? Is he a mere character created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle? Has Holmes ever existed? If so who is he?

Prologue

"... The idea amused me. What should I call the fellow?" thought Conan Doyle. Of course, he called him Sherlock Holmes after an English Cricketer, and Oliver Wendell Holmes {1809-1894}, an American physician, professor, and author.

*****

A young man intending to be a doctor took his degree from Edinburgh University in 1881 and set up his practice as an eye-specialist in suburb of Portsmouth and waited for patients. Six years later, this struggling doctor was still waiting. Without patients and utterly in need of money he decided to try his hand at writing.

He then vividly went back to his student days at Edinburgh University to recollect events and anecdotes, and then contemplated looking at the photograph of his teacher which he kept on the mantelpiece of his study. Something struck him. He took up the pen and sharpened his wits. That's it.

Thus was born Sherlock Holmes. And the young doctor was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930). The rest is history. Sherlock Holmes attained immortality - a sort of legendary cult-figure with a famous address behind him. 221 B Baker Street. It is believed, thousands of people have addressed their problems to this fictitious address desperately seeking solutions.

But sadly what is not history and what is buried under the debris of history of literature is, is the life and times of real Sherlock Holmes. Yes, he is none other than the creator's own teacher at Edinburgh University. He is Dr. Joseph Bell.

Dr. Joseph Bell (1837-1911), the eminent surgeon and medical instructor who had enthralled his students and friends with his deductive acrobatics in the Royal infirmary wards, in the dispensaries, especially in the out-patient department where ailing citizens visited him.

"Dr. Bell would sit in his receiving room," Doyle once told an interview, "with a face like a Red Indian, and diagnose people as they came in. Before they even opened their mouth he would tell them their symptoms and give them the details of their past life; and hardly ever would he make a mistake. With a woman especially, the observant doctor can often tell by noticing her exactly what part of her body she is going to talk about." Doyle concluded.

Once, a laborer with a spinal complaint has come to meet Dr. Bell. "Your back must ache badly, but carrying a load of bricks won't improve it." The laborer was stunned and asked Dr. Bell to tell as to how he guessed that he was a bricklayer by trade. And Dr. Bell replied by pointing to the laborer's peculiar rough horny hands.

Upon seeing another newcomer, Dr. Bell remarked, "A cobbler, I see." When his students put quizzical faces he explained, "that the inside of the knee of the man's trouser was worn; that was where the man had rested the lap-stone, a peculiarity only found in cobblers.

On another occasion, a tall weather-beaten patient entered the ward. Dr. Bell looked at him and turning to his students said, "Gentlemen, a fisherman." Before the students could react, Dr. Bell smilingly explained, "It is a very hot summer's day, yet the patient is wearing top boots. No one but a sailor would wear them in this season. The shade of his tan shows him to be a coast sailor; a knife scabbard too beneath his coat, the kind used by fishermen. To prove the correctness of these deductions, I noticed several minute fish scales adhering to his clothes and hands." Dr Bell ended leaving his students stunned.

One particular feat made a lasting impression on his ever-stunned students. Once Dr. Bell was seated at his desk with his internees and dresser, an old lady with a handbag hanging on her arm entered. Dr. Bell gave a quick glance and to the amazement of his students said to the woman, "Where is your cutty pipe?"

Her bag was on her left arm and instinctively she grasped it with her right hand. This act did not pass unnoticed by Dr. Bell. "Don't mind the students", said Bell to the embarrassed woman, "Show me the pipe." After a few minutes she put her hand into the bag and produced an odd short-stemmed much-used clay pipe.

Now Dr. Bell turning to his students asked, "Now how do I know she had a cutty pipe?" No answer.

"Did you notice the ulcer on her lower lip and the glossy scar on her left cheek indicating a superficial burn? All marks of a shot-stemmed clay pipe held close to the cheek while smoking - the characteristic attitude of peasant woman smoking clay pipe as she sits by her fireside." Dr. Bell explained smilingly.

No doubt every one of his students was impressed at these feats. But of all the Edinburgh University undergraduates, it was Conan Doyle who was the most deeply impressed by his incredible mentor and his deductive prowess; and the profound influence it had on him came to the fore when he decided to take up writing.

"I thought of my old teacher Joe Bell, of his eagle face, of his curious ways, of his eerie trick of spotting details," Doyle recollected in his autobiography. "If he were a detective he would surely reduce this fascinating but unrecognized business to something nearer to an exact science. It was surely possible in real life, so why should I not make it possible in fiction. It is all very well to say that a man is clever, but the reader wants to see examples of it - such examples as Dr. Bell gave us every day in the wards. The idea amused me. What should I call the fellow?"

Of course, he called him Sherlock Holmes after an English Cricketer, and Oliver Wendell Holmes {1809-1894}, an American physician, professor, and author. Now to give features and a face Conan Doyle again remembered his old mentor. Dr. Bell was forty-four when Doyle saw him last. "He was thin, wiry, and dark, with high-nosed acute face, penetrating grey eyes, angular shoulders and a jerky way of walking. His voice was high and discordant." With this as his model, Sherlock Holmes became the familiar, tall, stooped, hawk-faced, intense and inscrutable human bloodhound.

And Sherlock Holmes, solving baffling crimes in story after story with his deductive and analytical acrobatics went on to become a fictional cult-figure. Thanks to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The success of Sherlock Holmes only too pleased Dr. Bell. But very often an Edinburgh graduate would recognize who Sherlock Holmes was.

And Sir Arthur Conan Doyle too gladly confessed to the enquirers, the press and the world that the prototype for Sherlock Holmes was indeed Dr. Joseph Bell; and went on to give graphic examples of his teacher's "intuitive powers {which} were simply marvelous."

Once when a young Doyle was working as Dr. Bell's student assistant, a patient entered and sat down. Dr. Bell asked, "Did you like your walk over the side of the town?"

"Why yes, did your honor see me?"

Doyle who was listening was stunned. Dr. Bell then explained, "On a showery day such as that had been, the reddish clay at bare parts of the golf links adheres to the boots, and a tiny part is bound to remain. {As such} there is no clay anywhere else"{except that side of the town which the gentleman has come from}, concluded Dr. Bell.

Years later, in the adventure 'The Five Orange Pips' Sherlock Holmes repeats the same feat. But the most famous incident of which Doyle was very much impressed was when a civilian out-patient, a total stranger to Dr. Bell, came into his ward. In silence Dr. Bell studied the visitor, and then said, "Well my man, you have served in the army." Not long discharged; a non-commissioned officer? Stationed at Barbados?"

To all these questions the wide-eyed stranger replied meekly, "Yes and yes."

Dr. Bell then turned to his awe-struck students. "You see gentlemen, the man was a respectful man, but he did not remove his hat. They do not in the army, but he would have learned civilian ways had he been long discharged. He has an air of authority, and he is obviously Scottish. As a Barbados, his complaint is elephantiasis which is West Indian and not British.

This incident too made its way to Sherlock Holmes through, 'The Greek Interpreter'.

There were many such instances and anecdotes that Conan Doyle used in his sixty classic stories. In fact, it is reported that Doyle always requested Dr. Bell for plots and incidents that had Holmes flavor. And Dr. Bell happily obliged and faithfully sent along such ideas and plots which thrilled the readers worldwide.

Throughout his life, Dr. Joseph Bell continually amazed his circle with the observation game. Even the Crown was very much impressed by his detecting genius and sought his services as consultant detective. And for two decades he worked, investigated and testified for the Crown thereby solving even the most complex of crimes.

Dr. Joseph Bell went on to become a legend in his own right, even before he became known as Sherlock Holmes. Conan Doyle also did contribute and through Sherlock Holmes popularized his teacher's amazing talents at the game of observation and deduction.

Dr. Bell at the age of 16 entered Edinburgh University and graduated before he was twenty-one. Two years later he became a house surgeon in the Royal infirmary, and at twenty-six he was lecturing in the extra-mural medical school. He married at the age of twenty-eight. It was a happy but short-lived marriage. His wife died nine years later. He lived to his end a widower. Dr Bell was reserved and hated spotlight.

Dr. Bell preached what he practiced. He often told his students that the development of observation was a necessity to doctors and detectives and strongly recommended laymen to learn this thrilling sport.

His favorite demonstration before each new class in this regard was that he used to take up a tumbler filled with an amber-colored liquid. "This contains a very potent drug". Dr. Bell would say, "To the taste it is intensely bitter. Now I want to see how many of you developed your powers of perception. Now I want you to test it by smell and taste. I don't ask anything of my students which I wouldn't be willing to do myself. I will taste it before passing it round." said Bell.

Dr. Bell would then dip a finger into the liquid, put his finger to his mouth, suck it, and grimace. He would then pass the tumbler round. Each student likewise would dip a finger into the vile concoction, suck it, and make a sour face. When the tumbler had made the rounds Dr. Bell would gaze at the assembly and begin laughing. "Gentlemen, Gentlemen," he would say, "I am deeply grieved to find that not one of you developed this power of perception, which I so often speak about. For, if you had watched me closely, you would have found that, while I placed my forefinger in the bitter medicine, it was the middle finger which found its way into my mouth!"

Most of all he possessed a wonderful sense of humor. When visitors begged him to recount tales of his deductive prowess, he used to relate the story of his visit to a bed-ridden patient.

"Aren't you a bandsman?" Dr. Bell asked, standing over the patient.

"Aye," admitted the sick-man.

Dr. Bell turned cockily to his students. "You see gentleman, I am right. It is this quite simple. This man had a paralysis of the cheek muscles, the result of too much blowing at wind instruments. We need only inquire to confirm." Dr Bell said to his students proudly. Now turning to the patient he asked, "What instrument do you play my man?" The sick-man got up on his elbows, "Big Drum Doctor!" Now this time the students had a last laugh.

Dr. Joseph Bell, the prototype for Sherlock Holmes died at the age of seventy four in 1911.

This research-based article was published in my personal blog http://writersden-jay.blogspot.in/ under Human Interest Features Category.. You will find more such interesting stories on my blog. Also you can go through my other spiritual blog on Shirdi Sai Baba http://shirdisaibaba-jay.blogspot.in/


View the original article here

Sunday, February 10, 2013

The Pseudo-Gems and Flowering of Islamic Glass in Egypt, Persia, Iraq, Syria

Throughout the Middle Ages, public opinion considered the many-colored glass of Roman or Byzantine or Islamic origin, like precious stones and stored as such.

So it was considered the hemispherical blue Roman cup, known as "owned by the Queen Teodolinda", in the Treasury of the cathedral of Monza in Italy, which for a long time was thought to be cut by a colossal sapphire, as well as the green glass plate in the Abbey of Reichenau on Lake of Constance, called "the emerald of Charlemagne", because according to tradition, it was given to the sovereign by the Byzantine Empress Irene.

Most famous of all, the hexagonal green emerald cup with internal recess decorations, called the "Holy Basin" taken by the Genoese in 1101 during the sack of Caesarea and still preserved in the Treasury of San Lorenzo in Genoa.

This cup was believed in the past made from pure emerald and was in turn identified with the Holy Grail, or a gift of Solomon King to the Queen of Sheba, or the cup of which, after the torture, the head of St. John the Baptist was placed. Instead, it is probably a medieval Egyptian work, as no doubt is the plate of green emerald mentioned above. The emerald green glass that was made in Alexandria and Fostat (old Cairo) was well-known in the Middle Ages.

We will find in the following centuries among the Murano glass makers, the same passion for the counterfeiting of gems that we have seen in the Roman and Islamic world. The vibrant research of complex mixtures of colors to get the tonality and shades very similar to those of the gems, especially in ruby-red, emerald green and in the blue sapphire passionate since the nineties, constantly and proudly, the best bead makers in their realization of glass beads for Pandora, which recently have been able to even include semi-precious stones like cubic zirconia into the molten glass.

But in these centuries the art of glassmaking had a new miraculous rebirth in the Islamic East, whose influence was heard first in the Byzantine Empire and then in Venice.

To this revival that lasted from the eighth to the fourteenth century competed all major Muslim countries: Egypt, Iraq, Persia and Syria, with stylistic characteristics, at least until the year one thousand, almost identical, given the real artistic and cultural unity form which arose with Islam in its early centuries of life, as could you prove the impressive series of discoveries made in 1912-1914 by a German archaeological expedition in Samarra (Iraq), the famous city on the Tigris built-in 840 by the Caliph Billah Motasemm, where the Abbasids Caliphs lived until 970.

The Islamic glass from this period include different types and techniques: glass mosaic similar to Alexandrian "Murrini", but different from those for a typical dull yellow color, with motifs of eyes formed by dotted circles, probably carried by Egyptian artisans moved to the capital of Mesopotamia and used as wall decorations.

Small cups and bowls in transparent yellow glass, or dark green and amethyst, also of Egyptian production of the VIII-X centuries, mold decorated with isolated or grouped dots in clusters, and sometimes stylized animals, enclosed in medallions, worked with the pliers (these glasses remind to small medallions in molded glass, used by late Roman times onwards as measures of weight or capacity).

Large bowls and cups, and more rarely mugs and jugs in dark green or amber, with Kufic inscriptions or decorations, even with pliers, in linear shapes, geometric (knots and rosettes), and sometimes zoomorphic, probably made in Egypt between the tenth and the eleventh century; even small vials and perfume bottles, in blue or green glass, often with the neck almost cylindrical, sometimes decorated to the wheel, of Egyptian origin from the centuries IX and X.

Beautifully carved bowls and plates through a blue or green surface layer, with drawings of animals and arabesques, in patterns evidently derived from similar contemporary works in Islamic rock crystal, which suggests that these objects, all assigned to the ninth and tenth centuries, they have been produced by craftsmen close to those of Iraq and Egypt and in medieval times they had a reputation for very talented engravers of precious stones.

Some of these items show the particularity to present the detected decorations, obtained by lowering the bottom, such as cameos. The result is the most dazzling. Later a subspecies of this type to which it belongs among others, a beautiful bulb decorated with rams, kept in the Treasury of San Marco, consists of a series of glasses likely coming from Egypt in the form of calyx, decorated mostly with animals (lions, eagles, griffins) engraved in bas-relief, which in medieval Europe were used as reliquaries and are now stored in the Treasures of the cathedrals of some cities in Germany and Poland (the so-called glassware of St. Hedwig).

Is highly controversial the source of some glass items of the treasures in the cathedral of Halberstadt in Saxony and in the Basilica of San Marco in Venice, in the form of plates or scales of circular pans, mounted in the guise of hanging lamps, decorated with concentric circles in relief or circular concave and shallow facets. Some are reproductions in glass of silver lamps described by Paul Silenziario, originally existing in the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople and so the Byzantine manufacturing; according to others they should be attributed to Persian art of the Sassanid period.

Again in the Treasury of San Marco also are included two cups, respectively in turquoise and emerald green glass, with carved reliefs of crudely stylized hares, the second of which recalls the vials of perfume and the Holy Basin of which has been discussed above, and would be Egyptian, while the former, although bears engraved the words "Khorasan", it is not necessarily have to be Persian, partly because we know that it was offered as a gift to the Signoria from Agi Mohammed, legate of the Shah of Persia Uzunhassan in 1472, as authentic turquoise stone of the region, so the inscription might have had fraudulent intent.

Poor implementation was rather in the Islamic world the engraving by diamond tip, at least judging from the few pieces processed in this way and found in Samarra and Egypt.

I am an Italian glass jewelry designer, researcher, developer and a passionate problem solver for my glass masters and customers.

I'm writing a monumental History of Murano Glass

STRAVAGANTE Glass Jewelry Company is the only Italian producer of glass beads for Pandora. We are producers of quality and artistic handmade glass jewelry in about 10 glass laboratories based in North Italy.


View the original article here

Aerial Dogfight Over Tramore in WW2

My town Tramore is located in a quiet and peaceful corner of Ireland and during WW2 was not massively affected by what was going on in the rest of the world. People were aware of the war and food was rationed but life continued unaffected.

On Sunday morning 23rd of August 1942 things were to get a lot different, as many townsfolk made their way to 10am mass at the local church they heard loud noise from a German aircraft being chased by two British spitfires. Local people had to dive to safety as bullets rained down on the street as the Junker decreased altitude dramatically and came under fire.

The German plane a Junkers 88 taking fire from the British spitfires force landed in a field near Carriglong. The action seen over Tramore Bay, St Otterans Terrace and the Racecourse was part of a series of much larger events that started many hours earlier.

In a small airfield outside of Paris 4 German Luftwaffe airmen: Paul Stormer (Pilot), Karl Hund, Gottfried Berndt and Josef Reiser took off on a reconnaissance mission to obtain details about Belfast Harbour in Northern Ireland. The Junkers 88 flew along the east coast of Ireland and was spotted by many lookout boxes and eventually also by British radar that scrambled available Spitfires to intercept.

The first spitfire on the scene chased the Junkers 88 inland over Co Meath and in the aerial fight took a hit and crashed to the ground in flames. The pilot Officer Boleslaw Sauwiak died later from his injuries in hospital.

Not long after Sauwiak crashed his plane two more spitfires arrived on the scene from North Ireland. They chased the plane southward but after running out of ammunition and fuel had to retreat. The Junker headed its course towards Waterford flying over Kildare and Kilkenny on its way back to France. When over Waterford two more spitfires joined the fight this time from Wales causing the plane to force land in Tramore.

A local farmer seeing the plane crash on his land ran out to help, he was held at gun point by the 4 Luftwaffe men and once he calmed them down brought them back to the farmhouse where they were given a full Irish breakfast. Later that day the Irish Army arrested the men and brought them to the Curragh Camp where they were interned.

One of the Officers many years later returned to Tramore to see again the big bay over which his plane crashed.

This article was put together after reading the book Tramore of Long Ago by Andy Taylor and Internet Sources.

My name is Abbygail Wood and if you would like to read more about the History of Tramore then you should check out the Tramore community website.


View the original article here

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Was Christ Really Born on 25th of December?

Was Christ really born on 25th of December? What does the Holy Bible say on Christ's birth? What does pagan customs and traditions has to do with the celebration of birthday of Christ? Read on... here are the interesting facts dug out from the pages of ancient history.

Let history say whatever it has to say. But one thing is true. Jesus Christ was born. Doesn't mind the date and time. This article is only written from the point of academic interest. Treat it thus and correct me if I am wrong.

***

The Birth of Christ

"... behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which shall be unto all people. For unto you is born this day... a Savior, which is Christ the Lord. Luke 2: 10 & 11.

Its indeed good news that Christ the Lord, "... died for our sins... and buried; and rose again on the third day... " I Corinthians 15: 3 & 4. So that whosoever believeth on Him should have everlasting life... " John 3: 36.

What isn't good news is that the way the Christmas - supposed to be birthday of Lord Jesus Christ - is being celebrated. It has become a ritualistic festival with many pagan (non-Christian) customs being observed as a tradition on that day, thereby diluting the very essence of Christ's birth and His mission on this earth. I Peter 2: 24; Colossians 1: 14; and Isaiah 53: 5 & 6.

Even the ardent believer whose faith in the Word of God is unshakable seems to have fallen victim to the ritualistic celebrations, which is indeed abhorrence to Lord God.

For Christmas does not mean the birth of Christ. The word is made up of Christ + Mass which means Christ's Mass. The Mass is a much-sanctified religious service of the Roman Catholic Church, the performance of the sacrament of the Eucharist, i.e. ceremony performing Lord's Supper. And Mass is a Latin Word meaning dismiss.

Further, there is no precedence in the Bible where Christ's birth was celebrated. But the Lord did ask His people to remember His death. Luke 22: 19 & 20; and I Corinthians 11: 24 to 26.

No one can dispute the fact about Christ's birth. But it was definitely not on 25th December as believed by Christians throughout the world.

The Possible Scriptural Evidence

There is possible evidence to believe that Christ was born during the Feast of Tabernacles, which falls in the intervening months of September\October. Of course, one only has to study the Scriptures diligently and relate all the Old Testament prophecies concerning Jesus Christ and place all the feasts of the Lord in proper perspective in relationship to the Savior, (like Passover is related to His crucifixion and First fruits to His resurrection etc.) and interpret it correctly in the light of the Gospels.

Well, as of December and 25th; it is written in Luke 2: 8 to 11 that... shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night were told by the Angels of the Lord about Christ's birth. But this incident couldn't have happened in December. In Judea, at that time December was cold and at that a rainy season, which is most unlikely that shepherds were out in the field by night.

Also in verse 1 of the same chapter Luke says, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that the entire world should be taxed or registered for census purposes; and in subsequent verses 3 to 6, "all went to be taxed... Joseph also went up... to be taxed with Mary. This incident also cannot be traced to the month of December because middle of the winter was not fitting for such a business, especially for women with child, and children to travel in those days.

Even Christ has warned his disciples. "But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter." Mathew 24: 20. If winter was so bad (like hell) even to flee, then it was certainly not fit time for shepherds to be in the fields nor for women and children to travel.

Thus in the light of this argument we could well say, that Christ's birth and the occurrences of the events in Luke Chapter 2, could not have taken place during winter or more precisely in the month of December as was believed by Christians throughout the world.

Then how come December 25th has come into wide acceptance as the day of the birth of Christ?

The Significance of December 25th

To get at the root of this, one should go back to the ancient times and have a look at their customs and traditions that has unique relationship with the day of 25th December.

* December 25th was the day on which was celebrated the accouchement of the Queen of Heaven, the celestial Virgin, and the birth of her child, the sun-god.

* The Savior of Greeks, Bacchus or Dionysus was born of a Virgin on the 25th of December.

* So was Hercules. Isis, the Egyptians' Virgin Queen of Heaven delivered the child called Horus towards the end of December [probably 25th December].

* The Egyptians apart from worshiping the Virgin Mother, they also to the congregation exhibited the effigy of her babe lying in a manger, a custom that is very much in practice even today in churches and homes throughout the Christian world.

* In Rome, the day of winter solstice December 25th was celebrated as the birthday of the unconquered Sun; and it was the birthday of Mithra, the Persian sun-god, whose worship spread far and wide in the Roman Empire.

* Even in Hinduism, from time immemorial and to this day, Sun is worshiped as God. Yet Hinduism did not influence in fixing the Birth of Christ like other customs of the nations across Europe and West Asia did.

* In Rome, there was another festival called Saturnalia in honor of Saturn, the god of seed-time and harvest. This festival was celebrated with much gaiety and revelry for a week-long period during the end of December at winter solstice. It was just a kind of Christmas.

* The ancient Germans, Britons and Saxons burnt the Yule (Yule is the Chaldea name for an 'infant' or 'little child') log and banqueted at the winter solstice. Their bonfire symbolically represented the sun god's regeneration as he returned from his winter-home. Thus Christians of that time thought it fit to celebrate the birth of Christ on that day as burning of Yule log supposed to represent the Light of life.

* During the reign of Constantine the Emperor of Rome, the Church at Rome under Bishop Liberius, around 320 A D or 354 A D assigned and fixed December 25th as the day of celebration of Christmas.

December 25th was Fixed as Christ's Birthday

Thus by the end of the 4th century the whole of the Christian world was celebrating Christmas on 25th of December.

This is how the day of Mithraic feast of sun god; festival of Saturnalia; and the Yuletide feast; including the veneration of the Queen of Heaven followed by celebration in Egypt, Greek and other parts of the world under Roman Empire strongly influenced the day of Christ's birth, which came to be the 25th of December.

But not all fell in line and upright men like Tertullian (230 A D) protested and lamented. They blamed the Disciples of Christ in this respect and demanded they keep themselves away from world's idolatrous corruption. They couldn't stem the tide and gradually the church was submerged under pagan superstition.

John Chrysostom, an Antioch born zealous pastor and archbishop of Constantinople writing in Antioch about 380 A D says, "The birth of our Lord was unknown on the very borders of the Holy Land where He was born; but was made known in all the European regions of the west, from Thrace even to Spain... "

It is quite clear from the above statement that in those days itself the birth of Christ was unknown in a land where He was born.

Finally December 25th was Accepted as Christ's Birthday

By the turn of the 4th century, Christians began defending the celebration of Christmas on 25th December on the ground that it got an opportunity to turn the people away from pagan traditions to that of worshiping the Christ as Lord God and Savior.

To this effect, there went out an official decree to all to observe the festival of Christmas on 25th of December, for it gave them, they believed, a chance to put Jesus Christ, the "Sun of Righteousness" ( Malachi 4: 2 ) in peoples' hearts in place of the sun god Mithra. Yes, David also proclaimed in his Psalms 84:11 as "For the LORD God is a sun and shield... "

Thus, gradually by the year 450 A D and to this day, the 25th of December came to be observed as Christmas, the birth of Christ, throughout the Christian world.

This is Jayanarayana, a professional content writer based in Hyderabad, India. I have been providing content for various websites for the last 8 years. Writing is my passion. I own a couple of blogs http://writersden-jay.blogspot.in/ and http://shirdisaibaba-jay.blogspot.in/. Kindly go through them. You will find interesting articles which stimulate your thinking. Make you proactive.

Writersden-jay unravels the world the way it is. And why it is. Human Interest Features, Fiction, Jokes, Health & Lifestyle, Science & Spiritual and many more takes you into the world of mysteries and reality. I would be more humbled if you would enrich Writersden-jay with your wise comments and healthy criticism.

Shirdisaibaba-jay is another blog of mine that speaks about Lord God Shirdi Sai Baba, whose very Name evokes unspeakable joy in my heart. His Grace and Love is what I breathe. This blog is still under revamp stage. I am eagerly looking for His Grace to be upon me to complete this blog.


View the original article here

Hemingway's Writing and Some Major Features

Iceberg Theory-

Ernest Hemingway's 'The Iceberg Theory' describes the symbolic interpretations of a form of art. As a writer he had opted for this technique where he would write a surface story that omits the hidden point of the story. To apply this technique, an author has to omit the items that are already stated or the figures of speech or facts that seem too obvious. This technique make the readers compelled to think, understand, and really delve into the writing to understand the whole story.

Hemingway applied this technique because he used to believe that true meaning of a literary work should not be understood completely from the surface story. He believed that the heart of the story is to remain below the surface. In one of his writings he says-

"If a writer of prose knows enough about what he is writing about, he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water" (Death in the Afternoon)

Code Hero/ Hemingway Hero-

The basic concept of the 'Hemingway Hero' came as an outcome of the First World War. The American man suddenly realized that the old concepts and values or other ethics of the western world had not served to save the mankind from all the catastrophic results of the WWI. After this realization many sensitive, especially young writers began to look for a completely new set of values to replace the old ones after the War. Hemingway was one of these seekers. His search had resulted in a new sense of beliefs that reflected through his writings and through his heroes. Hemingway defines the "Code Hero" this way- "a man who lives correctly, following the ideals of honor, courage and endurance in a world that is sometimes chaotic, often stressful, and always painful."

The Hemingway Hero generally abided by a set of general principles. He can be said to be a "man's man". His characteristics generally included- heavy drinking, womanzing nature, involving in multiple love affairs, participating in hunting, enjoying bullfights. He was involved in all those 'manly' activities that a typical American man did not participate in.

Cubist Style/ Cubism-

Cubism is a form of art from the early 20th-century that is said to be pioneered originally by Picasso and Braque. This became a revolutionary technique in European painting and sculpture. This also inspired literature, music as well as architecture afterwards. In cubism, an object of art is analyzed, broken up and reassembled in various abstracted forms. This way a subject can be interpreted from a multiple point of views rather than depicting it only from a single point of view. Gertrude Stein was one of those people of the time who had been influenced by this form. Both Stein and her brother were important influences on Cubism themselves. In reading Hemingway, the concept of Cubism is important.


View the original article here

Friday, February 8, 2013

Personal Journals Can Bring Joy to the Autobiographer As Well As the Readers

Last weekend I was visiting an old friend who had moved up into the mountains and built himself an incredibly beautiful mansion. He is one of those interestingly successful men that decided college was not the route for him. Working extremely hard in the insurance business, he toiled his way into a substantial amount of residual income. He always had a love for animals, the west, the mountains, and one day had a dream to build himself a mountain retreat. Raising a large family of seven children did not keep him from the goal of retiring to his mountain estate. We lived on the other side of the fence from him and his family for a number of years. He would often talk about the land he had in the mountains where he would realize his dream. So, it was fun to visit him on his mountain estate complete with pool, barn, animals, pond, greenhouses, mini ski lift, mini cowboy town, and many more things to amuse and entertain the soul.

As we sat visiting in his spacious, uniquely decorated office, he handed me a few pages of his life story. He had spent the last few months reading through his journals and creating from them his autobiography. Assuming it was like most life stories, I wasn't really interested in its contents just then. However, as he and my husband visited about a number of things, my eyes wandered to the lines on the page in hand. Hmm, this is fascinating, I thought as I read along. Surely this couldn't really be his life? And he was very good with words - something I had not expected. The story line was very entertaining and captured my attention immediately.

I couldn't help asking a few questions. Where did he learn to write? Did these things really happen to him? Some of them were just plain funny. After a wide grin and a chuckle, he admitted that he had put his own twist on his life story. What? How can you call it your life story if it isn't accurate? His reply was that he wanted to spice it up and thought it would be fun to add a little more drama here and there.

I had to laugh. How would his kids know what really happened and what didn't? Although many of them had expressed dismay at having to sort out the truth from the fiction, he wasn't too worried about that. It was as if he had decided to make of his life - historical fiction. What a novel idea. I still don't know if I think he ought to have approached it that way, but it isn't my story to tell.

My point in writing this is, he was having a great time writing his memories, even if they were part fiction. His children anxiously awaited the continuation of his story. It brought him more feedback and interaction with his family than he had enjoyed in a long time. It was very therapeutic for him, and it was well worth reading. I asked him if he was going to print a companion book which separated out the truth from the fiction. He hadn't thought about doing that. It just shows you the difference in people, most of us just couldn't leave something like that to posterity without a disclaimer.

I was fascinated by the joy he was getting out of the whole process and decided that we all have a story to tell. Our lives are rich with experience and meaning. If you think you may ever want to write your memoirs - you ought to be keeping a personal journal now. Perhaps at some future time, you and your posterity will find joy and entertainment in the telling of your story.

If you are looking for an excellent personal journal complete with blank tabs and a travel companion - go to http://www.personalponderings.com/. The one line entry provides an index to your life that makes writing your memoirs easy and enjoyable.


View the original article here

Ptolemy and the Battle for Ancient Alexandria

Ptolemy sharpened his knife with a small stone as he carefully studied the dark waters for any sign of movement. The dense cloud-cover created an almost pitch-black night. By his feet laid a sword and bronze helmet, heavily dented and scratched from years of hand-to-hand combat in the wars of Alexander the Great. He thought to himself, if he were to bring twenty thousand men across that river for a surprise attack, tonight would be the night. Only Ptolemy's tall silhouette was visible when men finally approached and knelt down.

"General. We have a sighting."

That moment occurred two thousand, three hundred years ago in the Pelusium region of Egypt, when one man named Ptolemy was all that stood between Perdiccas, a power-hungry heir to Alexander the Great's empire, and civilization's most significant and influential achievement in science and technology, the Great Library of Alexandria. Ptolemy's astounding leadership and commitment to his vision was a gift to all man-kind, for all ages to come.

Not many people know that much of our advanced technology stands on pillars of math and science developed thousands of years ago during this magical time known as the Ptolemaic dynasty in ancient Egypt. And even less known, was the shocking violence that almost ended Ptolemy's dream of the cosmopolitan city named Alexandria before it ever had a chance. Dedicated to the peaceful pursuit of math, science and the arts, Alexandria left a legacy of unimaginable technology.

How ironic that the fate of such an advanced institute of peace, so far ahead of its time, would be determined by such barbarism and brutality, but that's how it was so long ago, and that was the burden this one man carried. Ptolemy, born in Macedonia, was the boy-hood friend of Alexander the Great, and eventually one of the top Generals in Alexander's legion. But when Alexander died and negotiations over who would inherit his vast empire failed, Ptolemy immediately took those soldiers most loyal to him and claimed Egypt as his own.

Perdiccas, another x-General from Alexander's legion, loathed Ptolemy after on-going disputes over territory and ruling power. But when Ptolemy literally stole Alexander's body from the control of Perdiccas, that was the final insult. After building an immense legion with massive war elephants, an insanely angry Perdiccas marched his deadly war machine towards Egypt to put an end to Ptolemy and his plans for the new city.

Facing such a horrific Armageddon of death, most anyone else would simply flee, but despite the minimal size of his defensive force, Ptolemy decided to fight for the future of Alexandria. Along the banks of the Nile River, the brilliant leadership of Ptolemy was put to the ultimate test in the shocking events that followed.

History may not remember with clarity all details of the battle for Alexandria, but we should never forget that long ago, thousands of men sacrificed their lives in the name of peace and science. And even today, our world is better because of it.

The magnificent and inspirational story of Ptolemy and the battle for ancient Alexandria is now told in my new novel, "Alexandria, the Stones of Macedonia", available at http://www.mpsoldo.com/. When purchased through that site, I will personally sign all copies sold, making them an extra special gift or addition to your personal collection.


View the original article here